For once I find myself in disagreement with this post's premises. As a progressive physician who believes all adults should have the right to choose their gender, I am dismayed to find myself in the company of reactionaries. As confirmed by the Cass Review, a similar US one, and the governments of many European countries, "puberty blockers," which are damaging to bones, IQ, and sexual functioning, should be used only in the context of controlled clinical trials.
My comment seems to have been cancelled, it was: As a progressive physician who believes all adults should have the right to choose their gender, I am dismayed to find myself in the company of reactionaries. As confirmed by the Cass Review, a similar US one, and the governments of many European countries, "puberty blockers," which are damaging to bones, IQ, and sexual functioning, should be used only in the context of controlled clinical trials.
For once I find myself in disagreement with this post's premises. As a progressive physician who believes all adults should have the right to choose their gender, I am dismayed to find myself in the company of reactionaries. As confirmed by the Cass Review, a similar US one, and the governments of many European countries, "puberty blockers," which are damaging to bones, IQ, and sexual functioning, should be used only in the context of controlled clinical trials.
My comment seems to have been cancelled, it was: As a progressive physician who believes all adults should have the right to choose their gender, I am dismayed to find myself in the company of reactionaries. As confirmed by the Cass Review, a similar US one, and the governments of many European countries, "puberty blockers," which are damaging to bones, IQ, and sexual functioning, should be used only in the context of controlled clinical trials.